Nutzung kryptographischer Funktionen zur Verbesserung der Systemzuverlässigkeit

Cryptographic techniques deal with securing information against unwanted usage, while coding techniques deals with keeping data error-free and retrieving them reliably. However, both techniques share many tools, bounds and limitations. In this thesis, several novel approaches towards improving system reliability by combining cryptographic and coding techniques in several constellations are presented. The first constellation is deploying pure cryptographic functions to improve reliability issues overshadowed in systems that previously had no reliability-supporting coding mechanisms. Such systems could have just authenticity, secrecy and/or integrity mechanisms for security services. The second constellation deploys a mixture of both cryptographic functions and error correction codes to improve the overall system reliability. The first contribution in this thesis, presents a new practical approach for detection and correction of execution errors for AES cipher. The source of such errors could be natural or as a result of fault injection attacks. The proposed approach is making use of the two linear mappings in the AES round structure for error control. The second contribution is investigating the possibility and ability of deploying pure cryptographic hash functions to detect and correct a class of errors. The error correction is achieved by deploying a part of the hash bits to correct a class of selected unidirectional error class with high probability. The error correction process would degrade the authentication level in a non-significant fashion. In the third and fourth contributions, we propose algorithms to improve system correctability beyond classical limits by combining coding and cryptographic functions. The new algorithms are based mainly on the fundamentals investigated in the second contribution as mechanisms to detect and correct errors. The new algorithms are investigated in terms of collision and attacking complexity, as error correction via hash matching is similar to a successful authentication attack. The resulting performance showed achievable good error correctability, authenticity, and integrity figures.Kryptografische Methoden zielen der Sicherung von Information gegen unerwünschte Nutzung, wobei Codierungstechnik behandelt die Korrektur der Fehler in den Daten und deren zuverlässigen Rückgewinnung. Beide Techniken bedienen sich ähnlich Instrumente und besitzen ähnliche grenzen und Grenzwerte. In diese Dissertation, werden mehrere neue Verfahren zur Verbesserung der Systemzuverlässigkeit durch verschiedene Konstellationen zur Kombination der beiden Fehlerkontrollcodierung und Kryptografische Verfahren. In der ersten Konstellation werden reine kryptologische Funktionen verwendet, die zur Verbesserung der Zuverlässigkeitsaspekte in den Systemen die keine Zuverlässigkeitsfördernde Codierungs-Maßnahme enthalten dienen. Solche Systeme besitzen z. B. nur Authentifikation, Geheimhaltung oder Integritäts-Mechanismen in den Sicherheitsdiensten. Die zweite Konstellation verwendet eine Kombination von Fehlerkorrigierende Codes und Krypto-Mechanismen für die Verbesserung der Zuverlässigkeit des Systems. Der erste Beitrag in diese Arbeit präsentiert ein neues praktisches Verfahren zur Erkennung und Korrektur von Verarbeitungsfehler in AES Chiffre. Die Ursachen solche Fehler konnten natürlich oder als Resultat eines beabsichtigten „Fault Injection“ Angriff sein. Das Verfahren nutzt die linearen Abbildungen im AES Runden-Funktion für Fehlerkontrolle. Der zweite Beitrag untersucht die Möglichkeit und Fähigkeit zur Einsatz von Hashfunktionen zur Erkennung und Korrektur vom Fehler. Die Fehlerkorrektur ist erreicht durch die Nutzung eines Anteil des Hash Bits um eine Klasse von ausgewähltem Unidirektionalen-Fehler mit höhe Wahrscheinlichkeit zu korrigieren. Dabei wird der Fehlerkorrekturprozess die Authentifikationsgrad des Hashfunktion nicht signifikant reduzieren. In den dritten und vierten Beitrag werden Algorithmen vorgeschlagen um die Zuverlässigkeit des System über die klassischen grenzen verbessert. Das wird durch Kombination von Kryptologischen und Codierung Funktionen erreicht. Die neuen Algorithmen sind auf die fundamentale Untersuchungen des zweiten Beitrag als Mechanismen für Fehlererkennung und Fehlerkorrektur basiert. Die neuen Algorithmen sind auf deren Kollision und Angriffskomplexität Verhalten untersucht worden, da Fehlerkorrektur durch Hashwert-Anpassung eines erfolgreichen Authentifikationsangriff ähnlich ist. Die resultierenden Verhalten zeigen gute Werte für erreichbare Fehlerkorrekturfähigkeit, Authentifikations-Grad und Integrität

A Modified Reverse Engineering Approach Using Bezier Curve Approximation

Reverse Engineering is a process of re-producing existing parts by obtaining digital models using a special data taken from the original parts using specific techniques. It can be used to redesign existing parts either due to lost data or the parts are no longer available. In this paper, surface modelling technique using special data taken from CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) was employed to redesign a candle holder. Specific MATLAB code was generated to model the data taken from the surface of a candle holder made of glass. Bezier curve technique was implemented in this research to model the curve of the outer surface of the candle holder. Various orders of Bezier curves were discussed and used to give better approximation of the original data curve with error percentage monitoring each time. The thickness of the candle holder was reduced from 5mm to 3mm and the volume reduction was calculated. The amount of reduction in the glass volume when reducing the thickness was found to be 210mm3. In addition, the amount of increase in the area of glass section was calculated to be 138.5mm2. This reduction gives a better vision of the amount of glass saved using this procedure. Two different shapes were found and plotted by varying the control points coordinates

Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit